In a bold move to protect young Australians from the risks of online harm, the Australian government has announced plans to introduce legislation aimed at banning children under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms. The move, described as “world-leading” by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, is set to have a major impact on how young people interact with social media and the internet.
Prime Minister Albanese has framed the new law as a critical step toward ensuring the safety and well-being of Australian children in the digital age. “This one is for the mums and dads,” he said, acknowledging the growing concerns parents have about the exposure of their children to harmful content online.
The government’s message is clear, they are responding to widespread anxiety about the impact of social media on the younger generation, which has been linked to issues such as cyberbullying, online harassment, mental health problems, and exposure to inappropriate content.
At a press conference, Albanese explained, “This one is for the mums and dads… They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online. I want Australian families to know that the government has your back.”
The legislation would prevent children under 16 from using social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook, and would impose strict regulations on social media companies to ensure compliance. Once the legislation is passed, it is expected to come into force 12 months later, with the government committing to review its effectiveness after this period.
According to the proposed law, the onus will be on social media companies, rather than parents or children, to ensure that underage users are not able to create accounts or access the platforms. Companies will be required to demonstrate that they are taking “reasonable steps” to prevent underage users from accessing their services.
The new law will apply to social media accounts, with particular emphasis on the ability to create and hold an account on these platforms. Importantly, the law would also apply to users who attempt to access social media in a logged-out state, making it clear that a child’s age will be a key factor in controlling access to these platforms.
While parents will no longer have to shoulder the responsibility of keeping their children off social media, the law will also aim to address the many unintended consequences that could arise, including exceptions for educational services that young people may need to access online.
The Age Limit Debate
The announcement of the legislation comes with some controversy. The age limit for the social media ban has been set at 16, and this decision was made by the government’s Cabinet after careful deliberation. While some advocates for stricter digital regulations argue that a higher age limit would be more appropriate, Albanese defended the decision, pointing out that the 16-year threshold aligns with other societal protections for young people, such as laws regarding alcohol consumption.
“We don’t argue that the changes that we will be legislating will fix everything immediately. We have laws such as people can’t buy alcohol if they’re under 18, and from time to time that can be broken.
But those laws set what the parameters are for our society, and they assist in ensuring the right outcomes. Now the Government’s proposed age is 16 – that decision was made in Cabinet on Monday”, he said.
Despite the government’s position, there is significant debate among netizens about the potential drawbacks of a complete social media ban. Some argue that restricting access to social media platforms will only delay young people’s inevitable exposure to these services.
Instead of banning platforms outright, these critics suggest that teaching young people how to navigate complex digital spaces safely and responsibly may be a more effective long-term solution.
eSafety
One of the key features of the proposed law is the role of the eSafety Commissioner, who would oversee the implementation and enforcement of the new age restrictions. The Commissioner will be tasked with ensuring that social media platforms are taking appropriate action to prevent underage users from signing up and accessing their services.
For those concerned about the effectiveness of this approach, Albanese emphasized that the government does not expect the new legislation to “fix everything immediately.” However, the law is seen as a critical step in addressing the systemic risks posed by social media platforms, which are increasingly recognized for their ability to shape young people’s behavior through targeted algorithms and manipulative content.
The law would also hold tech companies accountable for their role in these practices, rather than placing the burden solely on parents.
Potential for Unintended Consequences and Exemptions
As with any significant policy change, the proposed legislation is likely to have unintended consequences. While the government has made it clear that there will be exemptions to ensure that children can still access certain educational platforms and services, some critics argue that these exclusions may complicate the enforcement process and lead to loopholes.
Additionally, the government has stated that it will not allow exemptions based on parental consent, meaning that parents will not be able to bypass the age restrictions by granting permission for their children to use social media. While this decision has been lauded by some as a way to ensure uniformity and fairness, others argue that it may undermine parental authority in certain cases.
The Role of Social Media Companies
Social media companies have long faced criticism for their role in exposing young people to harmful online content. The algorithms that drive user engagement on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook are designed to keep users hooked, often promoting content that is sensational or provocative. This has raised concerns about the long-term impact on young people’s mental health and well-being.
Albanese’s comments reflect this concern: “These tech companies are incredibly powerful. These apps have algorithms that drive people towards certain behavior,” he said. The new legislation would force these companies to take more responsibility for how their platforms are used, particularly when it comes to young users.
“These tech companies are incredibly powerful. These apps have algorithms that drive people towards certain behaviour. The fact is that young women see images of particular body shapes that impact, have a real impact, in the real world. And young men through some of the misogynistic material that they get sent to them, not because they asked for it, but if you’re a 14 year old kid getting this stuff at a time where you’re going through life’s changes and maturing, it can be a really difficult time,” the PM said.
The proposed legislation has the potential to create significant pressure on social media platforms to make changes in how they operate, particularly when it comes to youth engagement and safety. However, whether this will lead to meaningful change remains to be seen.
Manbilas Singh is a talented writer and journalist who focuses on the finer details in every story and values integrity above everything. A self-proclaimed sleuth, he strives to expose the fine print behind seemingly mundane activities and aims to uncover the truth that is hidden from the general public. In his time away from work, he is a music aficionado and a nerd who revels in video & board games, books and Formula 1.
Comments