Senior Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) leader Suresh “Bhaiyyaji” Joshi has downplayed the ongoing controversy regarding the tomb of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, calling the issue “unnecessary.” His remarks come at a time when political parties have engaged in heated exchanges over whether the tomb should remain in place.

“The issue over Aurangzebs tomb is unnecessary,” Mr. Joshi stated while addressing reporters. He emphasized that Aurangzeb passed away in present-day Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, where his grave was subsequently built. Drawing a parallel with history, he mentioned that Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj had set a precedent of generosity by constructing a tomb for Afzal Khan, one of his adversaries. “This showcases Indias generosity and inclusiveness. The grave will remain, and anyone who wishes to visit it can do so,” Mr. Joshi affirmed.

Political Tensions and Chief Ministers Stand

The controversy gained traction after Samajwadi Party leader Abu Azmi praised Aurangzeb, sparking backlash from various political quarters. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis had previously supported demands for the tombs removal. However, he acknowledged that the issue must be addressed legally, as the tomb is classified as a protected monument under the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

As political leaders continued their war of words, the debate over the tomb escalated into a larger ideological conflict. While some leaders supported the removal of the tomb, others argued that history should not be used as a tool to incite division and discord.

Violence in Nagpur Following the Controversy

The controversy took a violent turn on March 17, when clashes erupted in Nagpur. The city witnessed widespread unrest, with houses and shops being vandalized, vehicles set on fire, and nearly 40 peopleincluding 14 police personnelinjured in the skirmishes. The violent developments fueled further debate on the political and social implications of the issue.

Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray commented on the violence, pointing out that Nagpur, which is home to the RSS headquarters, had not experienced riots in 300 years. Taking a dig at the ruling government, he remarked, “I am not the Chief Minister… nor am I the Home Minister. Ask the Chief Minister who is behind this violence. Because the RSS headquarters is there. There is a double-engine government here, and if it has failed, then they should resign.”

Congress and Opposition Leaders Criticize Attempts to Weaponize History

Congress leader Pawan Khera also weighed in on the issue, blaming the unrest on deliberate attempts to exploit history for political gains. “Attempts are being made to weaponize 300-year-old history and use it to create divisions, distractions, and unrest,” he stated. His remarks highlighted concerns about how historical events are sometimes manipulated to serve contemporary political narratives.

Meanwhile, RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale made an interesting observation by praising Dara Shikoh, Aurangzebs elder brother, as a more appropriate historical icon. Hosabale emphasized that Dara Shikoh was known for his respect for Indian culture and ethos, unlike his younger brother. He further remarked that many individuals who went against Indias core values had been unjustly celebrated in history.

Historical Context: Aurangzeb vs. Dara Shikoh

Aurangzeb and Dara Shikoh were among the four sons of Emperor Shah Jahan, and their battle for succession was one of the most significant conflicts in Mughal history. While Dara Shikoh was an advocate of religious inclusivity and admired for his philosophical and cultural pursuits, Aurangzebs strict policies led to widespread resistance. Eventually, Aurangzeb captured and executed Dara Shikoh, consolidating his reign over the Mughal Empire.

The ongoing debate over Aurangzebs tomb is thus intertwined with historical interpretations of his rule. While some view him as a ruler who expanded the Mughal Empire, others criticize his reign for being marked by religious intolerance and aggressive policies.

The controversy surrounding Aurangzebs tomb has taken center stage in Maharashtras political landscape, drawing reactions from various leaders across party lines. While the RSS has attempted to downplay the issue, political leaders from the opposition have accused the ruling government of leveraging history to fuel unrest. With legal protections governing the status of the tomb, the debate is likely to persist, underscoring the broader question of how historical figures should be remembered in modern India.